It seems the conversion from CSS to SCSS for staff-global.css (Bug 19474) has misplaced the colouring of the "overdue" class when viewing checkouts for a patron. 18.05, which does not use SCSS, has rules for ".overdue" and ".debit", but in the SCSS these are placed inside the "a" tag rule.
Created attachment 79821 [details] [review] Bug 21470: Due date no longer shown in red when viewing checkouts for a patron This patch corrects an error in the staff client CSS which was causing overdue items on the checkout screen to not be highlighted. To test, apply the patch and regenerate the staff client CSS (https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Working_with_SCSS_in_the_OPAC_and_staff_client). Check out to a patron who has overdues. The overdue items should have due dates styled bold and red.
Created attachment 80148 [details] [review] Bug 21470: Due date no longer shown in red when viewing checkouts for a patron This patch corrects an error in the staff client CSS which was causing overdue items on the checkout screen to not be highlighted. To test, apply the patch and regenerate the staff client CSS (https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Working_with_SCSS_in_the_OPAC_and_staff_client). Check out to a patron who has overdues. The overdue items should have due dates styled bold and red. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault@inLibro.com>
Created attachment 80163 [details] [review] Bug 21470: Due date no longer shown in red when viewing checkouts for a patron This patch corrects an error in the staff client CSS which was causing overdue items on the checkout screen to not be highlighted. To test, apply the patch and regenerate the staff client CSS (https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Working_with_SCSS_in_the_OPAC_and_staff_client). Check out to a patron who has overdues. The overdue items should have due dates styled bold and red. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault@inLibro.com>
Awesome work all! Pushed to master for 18.11
Caused by bug 19474 not in 18.05.x series.
+ .strong { + font-weight: bold; + } Was it expected?