When using UseACQFrameworkForBiblioRecords default indicators are not added to the record as configured in the ACQ framework. For a test: * Create 264 abc in your ACQ framework, set second indicator to default 1 * Create an order using the form * Verify the indicator hasn't been set For some fields where the label shown depends on the indicator, this creates a display issue.
Created attachment 155242 [details] Copyright statement without 2nd indicator Copyright statement without 2nd indicator
Created attachment 155243 [details] Copyright statement with 2nd indicator
Created attachment 155244 [details] Indicator in ACQ MARC Framework
We are having the same issue: I have created a MARC Framework for Acquisitions that has a 264 Tag with a second indicator of 4, subfield c, where we want to input the copyright date. I've included a screenshot of our MARC Framework. However, when our ACQ person fills out the form in Acquisitions and saves the record, the information shows it's recorded in 264 subfield c, but the indicator 4 is not present, even though I have it on the MARC framework. This makes a huge difference in the MARC record, because if the second indicator 4 IS present, the record display shows, "Copyright date: 2017" (Screenshot attached) When the second indicator 4 IS NOT present, it justs shows, "2017" without the copyright date text. (Screenshot attached) I would like to get this fixed so that I don't have to keep going into the MARC record to add the second indicator on this tag, when it should already be displaying according to the framework being used.