Bug 38821 - Create records for packages
Summary: Create records for packages
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ERM (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Jonathan Druart
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2025-01-04 09:35 UTC by Mathieu Saby
Modified: 2025-01-06 16:07 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mathieu Saby 2025-01-04 09:35:37 UTC
It could be nice to have the ability to create bibliographic record for packages. Particularly but not only for packagages for which the concept of "titles" is irrelevant (ex: Scopus, Visible Body...)
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2025-01-04 10:15:03 UTC
Do you mean a type of set record?
What would you want to use them for?
Comment 2 Mathieu Saby 2025-01-04 10:35:41 UTC
To make it available for patrons in OPAC...
Comment 3 Mathieu Saby 2025-01-04 10:36:02 UTC
(Alma does it)
Comment 4 Mathieu Saby 2025-01-04 10:44:41 UTC
Currently a workarround would be to create a unique title for the package
Comment 5 Katrin Fischer 2025-01-04 10:55:18 UTC
(In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #4)
> Currently a workarround would be to create a unique title for the package

Trying to understand what you have in mind :)

When we talk about package we mean a record that is indeed multiple resources or a package record that is for one resource only?
Comment 6 Jonathan Field 2025-01-06 09:09:32 UTC
(In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #4)
> Currently a workarround would be to create a unique title for the package

I've had this idea in my head that it would be nice to have an A-Z title list in the OPAC (for titles from ERM). It would also be nice if these surfaced in the search results, either as titles or maybe even package names?
Comment 7 Mathieu Saby 2025-01-06 16:07:36 UTC
As the "description" field is on agreement level, it is maybe the agreements that could be linked to records ?