Bug 40017 improved what you can show for additional fields in Z39.50 search results using the AdditionalFieldsInZ3950ResultSearch and AdditionalFieldsInZ3950ResultAuthSearch system preferences: 1. The complete leader with 000. 2. The complete control field, for example 008. 3. Specific positions in the leader or control fields, for example 000p1, 008p2, etc. 4. A range from the leader or control field, for example 000p6-7, 008p35-37, etc. Some examples of these should be added to the system preference descriptions.
I'm happy to create a patch for this (as it is within my capabilities!) Current descriptions: - AdditionalFieldsInZ3950ResultSearch: Display the MARC field/subfields __________ in the 'Additional fields' column of Z39.50 search results (use comma as delimiter e.g.: "001, 082$ab, 090$ab"). - AdditionalFieldsInZ3950ResultAuthSearch: Display the MARC field/subfields __________ in the 'Additional fields' column of Z39.50 search results (use comma as delimiter e.g.: "001, 035$a"). Generic: Display MARC field and subfields __________ in the additional fields column for Z39.50 search results (use a comma as a separator). Examples: - ... Examples for AdditionalFieldsInZ3950ResultSearch: - Fields: 082$ab, 090$ab - Specific positions for leader and control fields: 000p6, 000p6-7, 008, 008p35-37 . 000p6-7 for position 6 and 7 of the leader field (type of record and type of control) . 008p35-37 for position 35-57 (language) Examples for AdditionalFieldsInZ3950ResultAuthSearch: - Fields: 001, 035$a - Specific positions for leader and control fields: 000p5, 000p6-7, 008, 008p9-10 . 000p5 for position 5 of the leader field (record status) . 008p9-10 for positions 9 and 10 (kind of record and descriptive cataloging rules)
Should I add some UNIMARC examples?