Bug 7332 - Translated title (MARC21 field 242) doesn't display
Summary: Translated title (MARC21 field 242) doesn't display
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: MARC Bibliographic data support (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: PATCH-Sent (DO NOT USE) normal (vote)
Assignee: Jared Camins-Esakov
QA Contact: Ian Walls
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-07 21:44 UTC by Jared Camins-Esakov
Modified: 2012-10-25 23:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments
Bug 7332: Translated title (MARC21 242) not shown (4.73 KB, patch)
2011-12-08 14:21 UTC, Jared Camins-Esakov
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Signed off patch (4.76 KB, patch)
2011-12-08 23:25 UTC, Duncan
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jared Camins-Esakov 2011-12-07 21:44:35 UTC
MARC21 field 242 isn't displayed in the OPAC, even though it should be.
Comment 1 Jared Camins-Esakov 2011-12-08 14:21:44 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Duncan 2011-12-08 23:25:09 UTC
Created attachment 6684 [details] [review]
Signed off patch
Comment 3 Paul Poulain 2011-12-15 16:56:39 UTC
QA comment: started a thread on koha-devel to see if we must have a policy for XSLT changes
Comment 4 Katrin Fischer 2012-01-07 08:19:47 UTC
The mail from Paul and the discussion can be found here:
http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2011-December/036670.html

To me it seems like most people agreed on having more fields in the standard file unti a way can be found to make this easy customizable. Could this be moved on?
Comment 5 Paul Poulain 2012-01-09 20:03:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> The mail from Paul and the discussion can be found here:
> http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2011-December/036670.html
> 
> To me it seems like most people agreed on having more fields in the standard
> file unti a way can be found to make this easy customizable. Could this be
> moved on?

Agreed we can move on. I've 8 patches to push, many more to test & deal with, so if someone else want to QA, feel free
Comment 6 Paul Poulain 2012-01-17 16:47:26 UTC
QA comment: XSLT only, no specific comment

(i haven't tested this patch myself, as it's MARC21 specific and my setup is UNIMARC)