as per this spec... http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd260.html
(In reply to comment #0) > as per this spec... > > http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd260.html oops, 260$c *is* linked :) its linked to biblio.copyrightdate for MARC21 but, biblioitems.publicationyear for UNIMARC hmm, should they both point to the same DB field? does this need to be corrected still? i think they should both be the same. which one - i an not sure i'll leave this open for now...
Hi Mason, I am not sure, but maybe this is a WONTFIX. At least I am not sure how we can resolve this inconsistency correctly for new and existing installations.
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2) > Hi Mason, > I am not sure, but maybe this is a WONTFIX. At least I am not sure how we > can resolve this inconsistency correctly for new and existing installations. Hmm, yes i agree even if we were to fix this issue, i'm not sure which mapping of the two is the 'correct' one marking as WONTFIX