If you do a fielded search like au:smith, "Smith" will not get highlighted on the results page because the Javascript is looking for the exact string "au:smith"
Created attachment 20119 [details] [review] Bug 10686: Remove fields from searches for highlighting If you do a fielded search like au:smith, "Smith" will not get highlighted on the results page because the Javascript is looking for the exact string "au:smith." To test: 1) Turn on OpacHighlightedWords. 2) Do a simple keyword search. 3) Confirm that the word is highlighted on the results and details page. 4) Do a fielded search by entering au:smith (or whatever). 5) Confirm that the word is highlighted on the results and details page. 6) Sign off.
Created attachment 20192 [details] [review] Bug 10686: Remove fields from searches for highlighting If you do a fielded search like au:smith, "Smith" will not get highlighted on the results page because the Javascript is looking for the exact string "au:smith." To test: 1) Turn on OpacHighlightedWords. 2) Do a simple keyword search. 3) Confirm that the word is highlighted on the results and details page. 4) Do a fielded search by entering au:smith (or whatever). 5) Confirm that the word is highlighted on the results and details page. 6) Sign off. Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Created attachment 20404 [details] [review] Bug 10686: Remove fields from searches for highlighting If you do a fielded search like au:smith, "Smith" will not get highlighted on the results page because the Javascript is looking for the exact string "au:smith." To test: 1) Turn on OpacHighlightedWords. 2) Do a simple keyword search. 3) Confirm that the word is highlighted on the results and details page. 4) Do a fielded search by entering au:smith (or whatever). 5) Confirm that the word is highlighted on the results and details page. 6) Sign off. Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net> Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> Passes koha-qa.pl, works as advertised.
Pushed to master. Thanks, Jared! Not quite bulletproof yet, though (not that I think it will *ever* be completely) -- consider ti,wrdl:history
This patch has been pushed to 3.12.x, will be in 3.12.5. Thanks Jared!
Pushed to 3.10.x, will be in 3.10.11