Bug 10846 - Add preference for naming OverDrive collection
Summary: Add preference for naming OverDrive collection
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: System Administration (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
: 28038 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-09-09 15:12 UTC by Owen Leonard
Modified: 2023-07-08 17:25 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Owen Leonard 2013-09-09 15:12:12 UTC
It would be nice for libraries to be able to name their OverDrive collections, since "OverDrive" may not be the identifying term they use for that collection. In our case our contract with OverDrive is through a consortium, so our patrons know the collection by the consortium name.

Instead of seeing "OverDrive search for 'mystery'" patrons could see "Ohio eBook Project search for 'mystery'."
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2019-04-28 18:32:50 UTC
The problem with a pref would be translatability as you can only have one name for it. I am not sure how to best deal with this. We've had similar bugs reported for renaming course reserves and cart.
Comment 2 Owen Leonard 2020-04-28 15:22:17 UTC
Do we have the same problem with the LibraryName preference?
Comment 3 Katrin Fischer 2020-04-28 19:15:37 UTC
Hm, we probably have. It might not have come up so far, as a name might be used in different languages and not be translated? But I know some instutions have an official English name here too and for some we even switch the logo with language change.
Comment 4 Owen Leonard 2020-04-29 12:18:27 UTC
Perhaps this is a job for translatable authorized values (Bug 20307) or database translations (Bug 24975)?
Comment 5 Katrin Fischer 2020-04-29 19:42:50 UTC
(In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #4)
> Perhaps this is a job for translatable authorized values (Bug 20307) or
> database translations (Bug 24975)?

Yes, I'd say so. We are just not quite there yet.
Comment 6 Lucas Gass 2021-03-26 14:09:00 UTC
*** Bug 28038 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Katrin Fischer 2023-07-08 17:25:55 UTC
Would be using the HTML customizations be an option here now?