Bug 11066 - Export Citations not RDA compatible
Summary: Export Citations not RDA compatible
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: OPAC (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Joy Nelson
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 10344
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-10-16 23:13 UTC by Joy Nelson
Modified: 2015-06-04 23:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: Trivial patch
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments
Bug 11066: RIS and Bibtex Exports RDA compatible (2.66 KB, patch)
2013-10-26 04:13 UTC, Joy Nelson
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 11066: RIS and Bibtex Exports RDA compatible (2.71 KB, patch)
2013-12-23 20:56 UTC, Chris Cormack
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
[SIGNED OFF] Bug 11066: RIS and Bibtex Exports RDA compatible (3.50 KB, patch)
2013-12-27 21:27 UTC, Katrin Fischer
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
[PASSED QA] Bug 11066: RIS and Bibtex Exports RDA compatible (3.50 KB, patch)
2013-12-27 21:28 UTC, Katrin Fischer
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joy Nelson 2013-10-16 23:13:17 UTC
Exporting citations does not include the 264 tag for publisher information.  

Bibtex uses 260 tag, subfields $a address, $c Year, $b Publisher $f Editor

Endnote uses 206$a City 260$c Year 710$a Publisher

RIS uses 260 for publisher data.

For Marc records that are RDA records, the publisher information is contained in the 264 tag.    Can we update the export parameters to pull from the 264 and/or the 260?
Comment 1 Joy Nelson 2013-10-26 04:13:29 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Chris Cormack 2013-12-23 20:56:12 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 3 Katrin Fischer 2013-12-27 21:27:45 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Katrin Fischer 2013-12-27 21:28:42 UTC
Created attachment 23838 [details] [review]
[PASSED QA] Bug 11066: RIS and Bibtex Exports RDA compatible

RIS and Bibtex exports from staff side and OPAC edited to
allow for additional publisher RDA tag (264).  Script will
look first for 264 then fallback to 260 when pulling publisher
data from marc21 record.

Test Plan:
1. Create RDA and non RDA record
2. In OPAC, export both as RIS and Bibtex - verify publisher information is exported
3. On staff side, export records as RIS and Bibtex, verify publisher information
is exported.

Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed some tabs pointed out by the QA script.
Works nicely in my tests, no regressions found.
Comment 5 Galen Charlton 2014-01-03 15:56:48 UTC
Pushed to master, along with a regression test.  Thanks, Joy!

I note that a potential follow-up would be to take the 264 indicators into account, in order to select the correct one if the 264 is repeated.