Bug 11635 - 995$r defined twice in record.abs
Summary: 995$r defined twice in record.abs
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Searching (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low minor
Assignee: Fridolin Somers
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-01-29 16:25 UTC by Fridolin Somers
Modified: 2014-12-07 20:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: Trivial patch
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments
Bug 11635 - 995$r defined twice in record.abs (1.25 KB, patch)
2014-01-29 16:32 UTC, Fridolin Somers
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
[SIGNED OFF] Bug 11635 - 995$r defined twice in record.abs (1.31 KB, patch)
2014-01-30 04:37 UTC, Mark Tompsett
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
[PASSED QA] Bug 11635 - 995$r defined twice in record.abs (1.40 KB, patch)
2014-01-31 06:39 UTC, Katrin Fischer
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Fridolin Somers 2014-01-29 16:25:43 UTC
For UNIMARC flavor, in record.abs, 995$r defined twice.
Comment 1 Fridolin Somers 2014-01-29 16:32:05 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Mark Tompsett 2014-01-30 04:35:10 UTC
Eyeballing it, I can see it is duplicated.

Branched based on origin/master
Fully reindexed
OPAC searched for itemtype:dpn and itype:dpn -- 631 results

Applied patch
Fully reindexed
OPAC searched for itemtype:dpn and itype:dpn -- 631 results

cp ~/koha-dev/etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs ~/koha-dev/etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs.bak
cp ./etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs ~/koha-dev/etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs
Fully reindexed
OPAC searched for itemtype:dpn and itype:dpn -- 631 results

git reset --hard origin/master
Fully reindexed
OPAC searched for itemtype:dpn and itype:dpn -- 631 results

my reindexing gave my lots of warnings, but it was about indexing tags not found in attset(s). I figure I can ignore those.

I think my test covers it. I'm signing off.
Comment 3 Mark Tompsett 2014-01-30 04:37:44 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Katrin Fischer 2014-01-31 06:33:02 UTC
Hi Fridolin, please remember to assign the bug to yourself :)
Comment 5 Katrin Fischer 2014-01-31 06:39:08 UTC
Created attachment 24918 [details] [review]
[PASSED QA] Bug 11635 - 995$r defined twice in record.abs

For UNIMARC flavor, in record.abs, 995$r defined twice.

Test plan :
- Create a fresh install UNIMARC flavor and GRS1 indexing for biblios
- Re-indexe database
- Perform a search with index "itemtype" (and then "itype") on an existing value of 995$r. For example : itemtype:BOOK
=> Check you get results

Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Removes duplicated index definition.
Comment 6 Galen Charlton 2014-05-05 02:26:23 UTC
Pushed to master.  Thanks, Fridolin!