Created attachment 44726 [details] [review] Bug 13642 - Add 264 field to MARC21*DC.xsl Modify MARC21*DC.xsl to add RDA 264 field To test: - Copy from LOC z39.50 the Maxwell's handbook for RDA (ISBN 9780838911723) - Look the field 264 - In datail for the record, export or save to Dublin Core (the three options) - Open the xml generated, notice that <dc:publisher> and <dc:date> are not present - Apply this patch - Reload and export again - Open the xml, you will see the tags publisher and date taken from 264
Hi Frédéric I will change the commit message. Reproduce test isn't clear.
Created attachment 44773 [details] [review] Bug 15170 - Add 264 field to MARC21*DC.xsl Modify MARC21*DC.xsl to add RDA 264 field To test: -Apply on top bug 15162 this introduce changes to unapi -Copy from LOC z39.50 the Maxwell's handbook for RDA (ISBN 9780838911723) -Look the field 264 in framework, save record - Open this URL in OPAC /cgi-bin/koha/unapi?id=koha:biblionumber:41201&format=marcxml And play with id (the number of new record for Maxwell book) & format parameters Test format=rdfdc, format=srw_dc and format=oai_dc -Notice that <dc:publisher> and <dc:date> are not present -Apply this patch -Reload the URL for the three formats -You will see the tags publisher and date are taken from 264
Sorry, my mistake this patch no need bug 15162. Correcting attachment...
Created attachment 44774 [details] [review] Bug 15170 - Add 264 field to MARC21*DC.xsl Modify MARC21*DC.xsl to add RDA 264 field To test: -Copy from LOC z39.50 the Maxwell's handbook for RDA (ISBN 9780838911723) -Look the field 264 in framework, save record - Open this URL in OPAC /cgi-bin/koha/unapi?id=koha:biblionumber:41201&format=marcxml And play with id (the number of new record for Maxwell book) & format parameters Test format=rdfdc, format=srw_dc and format=oai_dc -Notice that <dc:publisher> and <dc:date> are not present -Apply this patch -Reload the URL for the three formats -You will see the tags publisher and date are taken from 264
Created attachment 45130 [details] [review] Bug 15170 - Add 264 field to MARC21*DC.xsl Modify MARC21*DC.xsl to add RDA 264 field To test: - Copy from LOC z39.50 the Maxwell's handbook for RDA (ISBN 9780838911723) - Look the field 264 in framework, save record - Open this URL in OPAC /cgi-bin/koha/unapi?id=koha:biblionumber:41201&format=marcxml And play with id (the number of new record for Maxwell book) & format parameters Test format=rdfdc, format=srw_dc and format=oai_dc - Notice that <dc:publisher> and <dc:date> are not present - Apply this patch - Reload the URL for the three formats - You will see the tags publisher and date are taken from 264 Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Created attachment 45629 [details] [review] [PASSED QA] Bug 15170 - Add 264 field to MARC21*DC.xsl Modify MARC21*DC.xsl to add RDA 264 field To test: - Copy from LOC z39.50 the Maxwell's handbook for RDA (ISBN 9780838911723) - Look the field 264 in framework, save record - Open this URL in OPAC /cgi-bin/koha/unapi?id=koha:biblionumber:41201&format=marcxml And play with id (the number of new record for Maxwell book) & format parameters Test format=rdfdc, format=srw_dc and format=oai_dc - Notice that <dc:publisher> and <dc:date> are not present - Apply this patch - Reload the URL for the three formats - You will see the tags publisher and date are taken from 264 Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Shifting this to be a 'bug', as more and more libraries want to use RDA and we don't fully support it yet.
Created attachment 46063 [details] [review] Bug 15170 - Add 264 field to MARC21*DC.xsl Modify MARC21*DC.xsl to add RDA 264 field To test: - Copy from LOC z39.50 the Maxwell's handbook for RDA (ISBN 9780838911723) - Look the field 264 in framework, save record - Open this URL in OPAC /cgi-bin/koha/unapi?id=koha:biblionumber:41201&format=marcxml And play with id (the number of new record for Maxwell book) & format parameters Test format=rdfdc, format=srw_dc and format=oai_dc - Notice that <dc:publisher> and <dc:date> are not present - Apply this patch - Reload the URL for the three formats - You will see the tags publisher and date are taken from 264 Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de> Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Pushed to Master - Thanks!
Switching severity to 'enhancement' as the patch does not fix any bug
Hi Julian, I think this is in a grey area - for libraries using RDA it means that the publication year, publisher etc. is missing from the export formats - which is quite important information.
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #12) > Hi Julian, I think this is in a grey area - for libraries using RDA it means > that the publication year, publisher etc. is missing from the export formats > - which is quite important information. Sorry, I didn't see comment 8. So, switching to 'normal' severity again, and I will push it into 3.22.x
Patch pushed to 3.22.x, will be in 3.22.2
Thx Julian!
This patch has been pushed to 3.20.x, will be in 3.20.8.