Created attachment 44796 [details] Marc preview and bibliographic record. 084 is shown in Marc but not on the bibliographic record. In Sweden we use field 084 in marc to store the classification code. In Koha the 084 field does not show on the bibliographic record. This pertains both the staff client and the opac. I tried to leave the XSLTDetailsDisplay-field blank in administration, but it's the same result.
Hi Krister, thx for filing a bug report. I am changing this to enh, because it's not a bug per definition. But it's certainly worth adding to the XSLT displays. The normal view that you see when you leave the XSLT prefs empty is no longer actively maintained and missing a lot of information - I'd recommend sticking with the default XSLT. Btw - not only in Sweden :) 084 is used whenever you have something that didn't end up having it's own field, like DDC or UDC have.
Created attachment 59134 [details] [review] Bug 15179 -Field 084 doesnt show on bibliographic record
Created attachment 59135 [details] [review] Bug 15179 -Field 084 doesnt show on bibliographic record
Test Plan Make sure the editor is checked for 084 in MARC frameworks Edit field 084 Save the record and confirm that the note does not show up in staff client or opac Apply patch and refresh page Field 084 should now show up in staff client and opac
Created attachment 59380 [details] [review] Bug 15179 -Field 084 doesnt show on bibliographic record Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Karen, thanks for your patch! One tiny thing: in the comment (first line) you copied "DDC Classification". You could change this to "Other classification" in a follow-up patch.
Created attachment 62870 [details] [review] Bug 15179 -Field 084 doesnt show on bibliographic record Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net> Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Created attachment 62871 [details] [review] Bug 15179 (QA Followup) Fix comments to 'other classification'
Pushed to master for 17.05, thanks Karen, Nick!
This won't get ported back to 16.11.x as it is an enhancement.