perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor fails with: Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) This is because of a hacky good single line of code. While correcting this for improved readability, attempt to get this to a higher level of perl critic.
Created attachment 48255 [details] [review] Bug 15871: Improve PerlCritic level for t/RecordProcessor.t perlcritic -5 failed. Attempt to clean up to a higher level: -- use English to address use of $@ variable -- perltidy on the code -- substitute q{} for '' -- expand out single line hacky goodness (... s/\.pm$//) to more code -- remove parenthesis on functions that don't need it -- add x, s, and m as needed to regexps -- change double quotes to single quotes where no variable involved -- tweaked eval destroy test to check return value and use $EVAL_ERROR -- renamed $processor to $record_processor in the subtest to avoid lexical warnings TEST PLAN --------- $ perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor.t Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) $ perlcritic -2 t/RecordProcessor.t No package-scoped "$VERSION" variable found at line 1, column 1. See page 404 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 39. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 33. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 33. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 66. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Expression form of "grep" at line 47, column 8. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Expression form of "grep" at line 50, column 20. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 50, column 26. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 50, column 26. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Return value of eval not tested at line 73, column 1. You can't depend upon the value of $@/$EVAL_ERROR to tell whether an eval failed. (Severity: 3) Magic punctuation variable $@ used at line 78, column 5. See page 79 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Reused variable name in lexical scope: $processor at line 84, column 5. Invent unique variable names. (Severity: 3) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 87, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 93, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 96, column 40. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 99, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 106, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t t/RecordProcessor.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) Result: PASS $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t ... $ git bz apply 15871 Repeat perlcritic level 2, and only $VERSION warning should exist. Retest with the prove. Run koha qa test tools.
Created attachment 48257 [details] [review] Bug 15871: Improve PerlCritic level for t/RecordProcessor.t perlcritic -5 failed. Attempt to clean up to a higher level: -- use English to address use of $@ variable -- perltidy on the code -- substitute q{} for '' -- expand out single line hacky goodness (... s/\.pm$//) to more code -- remove parenthesis on functions that don't need it -- add x, s, and m as needed to regexps -- change double quotes to single quotes where no variable involved -- tweaked eval destroy test to check return value and use $EVAL_ERROR -- renamed $processor to $record_processor in the subtest to avoid lexical warnings TEST PLAN --------- $ perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor.t Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) $ perlcritic -2 t/RecordProcessor.t No package-scoped "$VERSION" variable found at line 1, column 1. See page 404 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 39. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 33. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 33. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 66. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Expression form of "grep" at line 47, column 8. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Expression form of "grep" at line 50, column 20. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 50, column 26. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 50, column 26. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Return value of eval not tested at line 73, column 1. You can't depend upon the value of $@/$EVAL_ERROR to tell whether an eval failed. (Severity: 3) Magic punctuation variable $@ used at line 78, column 5. See page 79 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Reused variable name in lexical scope: $processor at line 84, column 5. Invent unique variable names. (Severity: 3) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 87, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 93, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 96, column 40. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 99, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 106, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t t/RecordProcessor.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) Result: PASS $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t ... $ git bz apply 15871 Repeat perlcritic level 2, and only $VERSION warning should exist. Retest with the prove. Run koha qa test tools.
Marked as trivial rather than an enhancement, because technically, the failure of perlcritic level 5 would mean it wouldn't pass koha qa test tools.
Created attachment 48325 [details] [review] Bug 15871: Improve PerlCritic level for t/RecordProcessor.t perlcritic -5 failed. Attempt to clean up to a higher level: -- use English to address use of $@ variable -- perltidy on the code -- substitute q{} for '' -- expand out single line hacky goodness (... s/\.pm$//) to more code -- remove parenthesis on functions that don't need it -- add x, s, and m as needed to regexps -- change double quotes to single quotes where no variable involved -- tweaked eval destroy test to check return value and use $EVAL_ERROR -- renamed $processor to $record_processor in the subtest to avoid lexical warnings TEST PLAN --------- $ perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor.t Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) $ perlcritic -2 t/RecordProcessor.t No package-scoped "$VERSION" variable found at line 1, column 1. See page 404 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 39. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 33. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 33. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 66. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Expression form of "grep" at line 47, column 8. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Expression form of "grep" at line 50, column 20. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 50, column 26. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 50, column 26. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Return value of eval not tested at line 73, column 1. You can't depend upon the value of $@/$EVAL_ERROR to tell whether an eval failed. (Severity: 3) Magic punctuation variable $@ used at line 78, column 5. See page 79 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Reused variable name in lexical scope: $processor at line 84, column 5. Invent unique variable names. (Severity: 3) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 87, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 93, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 96, column 40. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 99, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 106, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t t/RecordProcessor.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) Result: PASS $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t ... $ git bz apply 15871 Repeat perlcritic level 2, and only $VERSION warning should exist. Retest with the prove. Run koha qa test tools.
Created attachment 48326 [details] [review] Bug 15871: Improve PerlCritic level for t/RecordProcessor.t perlcritic -5 failed. Attempt to clean up to a higher level: -- use English to address use of $@ variable -- perltidy on the code -- substitute q{} for '' -- expand out single line hacky goodness (... s/\.pm$//) to more code -- remove parenthesis on functions that don't need it -- add x, s, and m as needed to regexps -- change double quotes to single quotes where no variable involved -- tweaked eval destroy test to check return value and use $EVAL_ERROR -- renamed $processor to $record_processor in the subtest to avoid lexical warnings TEST PLAN --------- $ perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor.t Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) $ perlcritic -2 t/RecordProcessor.t No package-scoped "$VERSION" variable found at line 1, column 1. See page 404 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 39. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 33. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 33. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 66. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Expression form of "grep" at line 47, column 8. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Expression form of "grep" at line 50, column 20. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 50, column 26. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 50, column 26. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Return value of eval not tested at line 73, column 1. You can't depend upon the value of $@/$EVAL_ERROR to tell whether an eval failed. (Severity: 3) Magic punctuation variable $@ used at line 78, column 5. See page 79 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Reused variable name in lexical scope: $processor at line 84, column 5. Invent unique variable names. (Severity: 3) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 87, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 93, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 96, column 40. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 99, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 106, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t t/RecordProcessor.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) Result: PASS $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t ... $ git bz apply 15871 Repeat perlcritic level 2, and only $VERSION warning should exist. Retest with the prove. Run koha qa test tools.
Cleaned up after a rebase. Ready for signoff. :)
Created attachment 48336 [details] [review] [SIGNED-OFF]Bug 15871: Improve PerlCritic level for t/RecordProcessor.t perlcritic -5 failed. Attempt to clean up to a higher level: -- use English to address use of $@ variable -- perltidy on the code -- substitute q{} for '' -- expand out single line hacky goodness (... s/\.pm$//) to more code -- remove parenthesis on functions that don't need it -- add x, s, and m as needed to regexps -- change double quotes to single quotes where no variable involved -- tweaked eval destroy test to check return value and use $EVAL_ERROR -- renamed $processor to $record_processor in the subtest to avoid lexical warnings TEST PLAN --------- $ perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor.t Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) $ perlcritic -2 t/RecordProcessor.t No package-scoped "$VERSION" variable found at line 1, column 1. See page 404 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 39. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 33. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 33. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 66. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Expression form of "grep" at line 47, column 8. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Expression form of "grep" at line 50, column 20. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 50, column 26. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 50, column 26. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Return value of eval not tested at line 73, column 1. You can't depend upon the value of $@/$EVAL_ERROR to tell whether an eval failed. (Severity: 3) Magic punctuation variable $@ used at line 78, column 5. See page 79 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Reused variable name in lexical scope: $processor at line 84, column 5. Invent unique variable names. (Severity: 3) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 87, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 93, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 96, column 40. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 99, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 106, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t t/RecordProcessor.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) Result: PASS $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t ... $ git bz apply 15871 Repeat perlcritic level 2, and only $VERSION warning should exist. Retest with the prove. Run koha qa test tools. Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com> Works as advertised
Created attachment 48349 [details] [review] [SIGNED-OFF] Bug 15871: Improve PerlCritic level for t/RecordProcessor.t perlcritic -5 failed. Attempt to clean up to a higher level: -- use English to address use of $@ variable -- perltidy on the code -- substitute q{} for '' -- expand out single line hacky goodness (... s/\.pm$//) to more code -- remove parenthesis on functions that don't need it -- add x, s, and m as needed to regexps -- change double quotes to single quotes where no variable involved -- tweaked eval destroy test to check return value and use $EVAL_ERROR -- renamed $processor to $record_processor in the subtest to avoid lexical warnings TEST PLAN --------- $ perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor.t Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) $ perlcritic -2 t/RecordProcessor.t No package-scoped "$VERSION" variable found at line 1, column 1. See page 404 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 39. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 33. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 33. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 66. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Expression form of "grep" at line 47, column 8. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Expression form of "grep" at line 50, column 20. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 50, column 26. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 50, column 26. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Return value of eval not tested at line 73, column 1. You can't depend upon the value of $@/$EVAL_ERROR to tell whether an eval failed. (Severity: 3) Magic punctuation variable $@ used at line 78, column 5. See page 79 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Reused variable name in lexical scope: $processor at line 84, column 5. Invent unique variable names. (Severity: 3) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 87, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 93, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 96, column 40. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 99, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 106, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t t/RecordProcessor.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) Result: PASS $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t ... $ git bz apply 15871 Repeat perlcritic level 2, and only $VERSION warning should exist. Retest with the prove. Run koha qa test tools. Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com> Works as advertised Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Created attachment 48631 [details] [review] Bug 15871: Improve PerlCritic level for t/RecordProcessor.t perlcritic -5 failed. Attempt to clean up to a higher level: -- use English to address use of $@ variable -- perltidy on the code -- substitute q{} for '' -- expand out single line hacky goodness (... s/\.pm$//) to more code -- remove parenthesis on functions that don't need it -- add x, s, and m as needed to regexps -- change double quotes to single quotes where no variable involved -- tweaked eval destroy test to check return value and use $EVAL_ERROR -- renamed $processor to $record_processor in the subtest to avoid lexical warnings TEST PLAN --------- $ perlcritic -5 t/RecordProcessor.t Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) $ perlcritic -2 t/RecordProcessor.t No package-scoped "$VERSION" variable found at line 1, column 1. See page 404 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 34, column 39. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 33. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 36, column 36. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Don't modify $_ in list functions at line 43, column 25. See page 114 of PBP. (Severity: 5) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 33. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 33. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 43, column 66. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/x" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 236 of PBP. (Severity: 3) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 43, column 66. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Expression form of "grep" at line 47, column 8. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Expression form of "grep" at line 50, column 20. See page 169 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Regular expression without "/s" flag at line 50, column 26. See pages 240,241 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Regular expression without "/m" flag at line 50, column 26. See page 237 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Return value of eval not tested at line 73, column 1. You can't depend upon the value of $@/$EVAL_ERROR to tell whether an eval failed. (Severity: 3) Magic punctuation variable $@ used at line 78, column 5. See page 79 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Reused variable name in lexical scope: $processor at line 84, column 5. Invent unique variable names. (Severity: 3) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 87, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 93, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Quotes used with a string containing no non-whitespace characters at line 96, column 40. See page 53 of PBP. (Severity: 2) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 99, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) Subroutine "new" called using indirect syntax at line 106, column 18. See page 349 of PBP. (Severity: 4) $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t t/RecordProcessor.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) Result: PASS $ prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t ... $ git bz apply 15871 Repeat perlcritic level 2, and only $VERSION warning should exist. Retest with the prove. Run koha qa test tools. Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com> Works as advertised Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar> I don't really care about perlcritic as long as it involves changing '' into qw{} (WTF?) Anyway, I'd do this kind of things as we go, for example, if we were adding more tests. In that case it would just be a followup for this, after you provided a patch for an enh/bugfix.
Pushed to Master - Should be in the May 2016 Release. Thanks!
Patch pushed to 3.22.x, will be in 3.22.5