The 777 field is not one of the fields currently displayed in staff or OPAC normal view. It is visible in the MARC view, but this does not enable the link (via subfield w) to the related record. The subfields are identical to 773 (which does display in the normal view). The main difference being the automatic text generated by the indicators. http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/concise/bd777.html This is a very important field for music libraries.
Created attachment 110307 [details] [review] Bug 16728: Add MARC21 777 - Issued with entry to staff and OPAC detail pages This adds the 777 - Issued with entry to the staff and OPAC detail pages. It's built using the template for 773 with minor adjustments. To test: - Apply patch - Catalog several 777 fields in one or more of your records - When using 1st indicator = 1, the note won't display - When using 2nd indicator empty, label will be "Issued with:" - When using 2nd indicator 8, the label will be drawn from $i if present - When $w and UseControlNumber pref is used, the link will be built using $w - In all other cases the title form $t will be used for the link - Verify the display is correct Examples for 777 can be found in the LOC MARC21 documentation: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd777.html Note: Because the label depends on the 2nd indicator, the label is repeated for every 777 on a record.
Created attachment 110416 [details] [review] Bug 16728: Add MARC21 777 - Issued with entry to staff and OPAC detail pages This adds the 777 - Issued with entry to the staff and OPAC detail pages. It's built using the template for 773 with minor adjustments. To test: - Apply patch - Catalog several 777 fields in one or more of your records - When using 1st indicator = 1, the note won't display - When using 2nd indicator empty, label will be "Issued with:" - When using 2nd indicator 8, the label will be drawn from $i if present - When $w and UseControlNumber pref is used, the link will be built using $w - In all other cases the title form $t will be used for the link - Verify the display is correct Examples for 777 can be found in the LOC MARC21 documentation: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd777.html Note: Because the label depends on the 2nd indicator, the label is repeated for every 777 on a record. Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
I think this all works as expected, however it may be best to get someone more familiar with cataloguing and it's nuances to check as well. Wasn't sure about $w and UseControlNumber - for me the link generated was to the record with the control number, but the text stayed as what is in $t.
(In reply to David Nind from comment #3) > I think this all works as expected, however it may be best to get someone > more familiar with cataloguing and it's nuances to check as well. > > Wasn't sure about $w and UseControlNumber - for me the link generated was to > the record with the control number, but the text stayed as what is in $t. The link test should not change, only the link itself. So that sounds alright :)
Created attachment 111246 [details] [review] Bug 16728: Add MARC21 777 - Issued with entry to staff and OPAC detail pages This adds the 777 - Issued with entry to the staff and OPAC detail pages. It's built using the template for 773 with minor adjustments. To test: - Apply patch - Catalog several 777 fields in one or more of your records - When using 1st indicator = 1, the note won't display - When using 2nd indicator empty, label will be "Issued with:" - When using 2nd indicator 8, the label will be drawn from $i if present - When $w and UseControlNumber pref is used, the link will be built using $w - In all other cases the title form $t will be used for the link - Verify the display is correct Examples for 777 can be found in the LOC MARC21 documentation: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd777.html Note: Because the label depends on the 2nd indicator, the label is repeated for every 777 on a record. Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Passing QA, thanks Katrin :)
Pushed to master for 20.11, thanks to everybody involved!
enhancement will not be backported to 20.05.x