Created attachment 93659 [details] Sample bib record with control number field The "Advanced Search" in the Advanced Editor is not returning searches by Control Number Steps to reproduce: 1. Import a bibliographic record with the 001 field populated (attached is the sample record I used, with Control Number "faw00039489") 2. Go to More -> Cataloging 3. Click on the Advanced Editor button 4. Click "Advanced" from the left side menu 5. Enter the control number from step 1 (faw00039489 from my example) ; verify that "Local Catalog" is checked 6. Click "Search" button Result: zero results Expected results: Bibliographic record from step 1 is returned
While digging into this bug it appears that the control number is working for Z39.5 servers (like Library of Congress), but not for the local catalog. Perhaps there is a setting one needs to update?
For the 'Control number' field in rancor advanced search we actually map it to "attr 1=12" which is Local-number In Unimarc we map 001 into Local-number, but in MARC21 we map it to Contorl-number to test, try a search for: Local-number: faw00039489 vs Control-number: faw00039489 koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/lib/koha/cateditor/search.js: 25 var _pqfMapping = { 26 author: '1=1003', // s=al', 27 cn_dewey: '1=13', 28 cn_lc: '1=16', 29 date: '1=30', // r=r', 30 isbn: '1=7', 31 issn: '1=8', 32 lccn: '1=9', 33 local_number: '1=12', 34 music_identifier: '1=51', 35 standard_identifier: '1=1007', 36 subject: '1=21', // s=al', 37 term: '1=1016', // t=l,r s=al', 38 title: '1=4', // s=al', 39 }
Nick, thanks for looking into this, but I am not seeing anyway to search "Local-number" in the Advanced Editor? Am I missing something? https://paste.pics/b86b3bb78a94487d57cb9623c649dd0e
(In reply to Cori Lynn Arnold from comment #3) > Nick, thanks for looking into this, but I am not seeing anyway to search > "Local-number" in the Advanced Editor? Am I missing something? > > https://paste.pics/b86b3bb78a94487d57cb9623c649dd0e You can search that in the general koha search bar, just enter: Local-number: faw00039489 it shoudl have no results Control-number should find the correct record
Okay, great workaround, but we'd love to see this working in the "Advanced Search" area as well.