Bug 25270 - Physical description/format is inconsistent between MARC21slim2OPACResults.xsl and MARC21slim2intranetResults.xsl
Summary: Physical description/format is inconsistent between MARC21slim2OPACResults.xs...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: MARC Bibliographic data support (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low normal (vote)
Assignee: Katrin Fischer
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-04-23 21:23 UTC by Lucas Gass
Modified: 2021-08-24 10:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lucas Gass 2020-04-23 21:23:04 UTC
There are some inconsistencies between the OPAC results and Staff results XSLT styleheets. 

Many of the 007 first position and second position combinations that define the "Format:"  are inconsistent. These 2 XSLT files should be consistent.
Comment 1 Lucas Gass 2020-04-23 21:32:40 UTC
Also, the OPAC details and intranet details do not display any of this information. Should they?
Comment 2 Annette 2020-04-27 18:20:47 UTC
Yes, the OPAC and intranet details should display this information. Consistency is very important and the information in the 007 is very useful/helpful to both user and staff.
Comment 3 Katrin Fischer 2020-09-13 21:50:45 UTC
Hi Lucas, 

would you mind me stealing this one? I didn't realize there was already a bug and have started some work already. What I am planning to do:

1) Move all the code for the description/format/materialtype line into include files for staff and OPAC
2) Compare the 2 files and find the differences
3) Resolve the differences
4) Change the files so they are the same for OPAC and staff (in the future, they could just be copied whenever a change is needed/made.

What do you think?

I am almost finished with 1).
Comment 4 Lucas Gass 2020-09-14 14:23:00 UTC
Cait, that sounds great to me!
Comment 5 Katrin Fischer 2021-08-24 10:59:15 UTC
Just to explain why this hasn't moved much... I lost my branch with a lot of work already done by accident and haven't been able to start over yet.