Hi, I read this sentence : "Last item for bibliographic record wich biblio-level hold on it" I think this should be (as in 19.xx versions) : "Last item for bibliographic record with biblio-level hold on it" This string is in the following files : koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/tools/batchMod-del.tt:5 koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/tools/batchMod-del.tt:11 In case you need them, here are the links in Pootle : https://translate.koha-community.org/fr/20.05/translate/fr-FR-messages.po#unit=14490879 https://translate.koha-community.org/fr/20.11/translate/fr-FR-messages.po#unit=15323820
Created attachment 115677 [details] [review] Bug 27525: Replace "wich" with "with" in batch delete template This patch corrects two typos: "wich" -> "with." To test, apply the patch and check the batch delete template (batchMod-del.tt) and confirm that the two instances of this sentence are correct: "Last item for bibliographic record with biblio-level hold on it"
Created attachment 115735 [details] [review] Bug 27525: Replace "wich" with "with" in batch delete template This patch corrects two typos: "wich" -> "with." To test, apply the patch and check the batch delete template (batchMod-del.tt) and confirm that the two instances of this sentence are correct: "Last item for bibliographic record with biblio-level hold on it" Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Testing notes: - I just reviewed the diff, rather than trying to generate the message in the staff interface
Created attachment 115837 [details] [review] Bug 27525: Replace "wich" with "with" in batch delete template This patch corrects two typos: "wich" -> "with." To test, apply the patch and check the batch delete template (batchMod-del.tt) and confirm that the two instances of this sentence are correct: "Last item for bibliographic record with biblio-level hold on it" Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Pushed to master for 21.05, thanks to everybody involved!
Pushed to 20.11.x for 20.11.03
Pushed to 20.05.x for 20.05.09
Missing dependencies for 19.11.x, it shouldn't be affected, no backport. Confirmed by grepping