In the English templates some labels overlap with the input fields on the fund entry/edit form. These are: * Statistic 1 done on: * Statistic 2 done on: In general we see a lot of these issues in translated templates as well. Could we standardize on a wider area for labels or make it more flexible?
Created attachment 141303 [details] [review] Bug 31420: Managing funds: Labels of statistic fields overlap with pull downs This patch removes some very old inline style attributes from the fund edit form. The "white-space" attribute prevented label text from naturally wrapping. To test, apply the patch and go to Administration -> Funds. - In the list of funds, click Actions -> Edit. - The the form, confirm that the text of the "Statistic" 1 and 2 labels wraps, not getting hidden by the associated select tags.
Created attachment 141404 [details] [review] Bug 31420: Managing funds: Labels of statistic fields overlap with pull downs This patch removes some very old inline style attributes from the fund edit form. The "white-space" attribute prevented label text from naturally wrapping. To test, apply the patch and go to Administration -> Funds. - In the list of funds, click Actions -> Edit. - The the form, confirm that the text of the "Statistic" 1 and 2 labels wraps, not getting hidden by the associated select tags. Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Created attachment 141477 [details] [review] Bug 31420: Managing funds: Labels of statistic fields overlap with pull downs This patch removes some very old inline style attributes from the fund edit form. The "white-space" attribute prevented label text from naturally wrapping. To test, apply the patch and go to Administration -> Funds. - In the list of funds, click Actions -> Edit. - The the form, confirm that the text of the "Statistic" 1 and 2 labels wraps, not getting hidden by the associated select tags. Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov> Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Pushed to master for 22.11. Nice work everyone, thanks!
Backported to 22.05.x for upcoming 22.05.08
applied to 21.11 for 21.11.15
Not backported to 21.05.x