---- Reported by nahuel.angelinetti@biblibre.com 2009-08-26 12:08:20 ---- The print link, should use javascript print function, not a popup that is different of the actual view. ---- Additional Comments From nahuel.angelinetti@biblibre.com 2009-08-26 12:09:37 ---- Created an attachment bugfix ---- Additional Comments From nahuel.angelinetti@biblibre.com 2009-08-26 13:32:37 ---- Created an attachment head's bugfix --- Bug imported by chris@bigballofwax.co.nz 2010-05-21 01:12 UTC --- This bug was previously known as _bug_ 3554 at http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3554 Imported an attachment (id=1414) Imported an attachment (id=1415) Actual time not defined. Setting to 0.0 The original submitter of attachment 1414 [details] [review] is unknown. Reassigning to the person who moved it here: chris@bigballofwax.co.nz. The original submitter of attachment 1415 [details] [review] is unknown. Reassigning to the person who moved it here: chris@bigballofwax.co.nz.
I see this patch has been pushed to HEAD (as part of biblibre-integration I guess), which I think is unfortunate. Here's the comment I made on the patches list at the time: This breaks the "Print" link for users with JavaScript disabled. I like the idea of eliminating the dedicated print view, but even if we had a perfected print stylesheet for the relevant pages I think usability issues remain with the idea of providing a print view which is not visible to the user. Even if the print stylesheet gave a properly-formatted view (and I would argue it doesn't), how does the average user know that by printing the page they'll get a print-formatted view? I like that the dedicated printing page offers that.
Owen, is this still valid?