Bug 3571 - AutoTruncation is not allowed alone
Summary: AutoTruncation is not allowed alone
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Searching (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: PC All
: P5 - low normal (vote)
Assignee: Henri-Damien LAURENT
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-09-02 01:45 UTC by Henri-Damien LAURENT
Modified: 2013-12-05 19:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments
this patch enables autotruncation when QueryAutoTruncate Is set (1.87 KB, patch)
2009-09-02 13:49 UTC, Chris Cormack
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Chris Cormack 2010-05-21 01:12:17 UTC


---- Reported by henridamien@koha-fr.org 2009-09-02 13:45:06 ----

Auto truncation and QueryAutotruncate system preference would not work without QueryStemming.
Search on a truncated word and then on two, or three with only QueryAutoTruncate



---- Additional Comments From henridamien@koha-fr.org 2009-09-02 13:49:10 ----

Created an attachment
this patch enables autotruncation when QueryAutoTruncate Is set





--- Bug imported by chris@bigballofwax.co.nz 2010-05-21 01:12 UTC  ---

This bug was previously known as _bug_ 3571 at http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3571
Imported an attachment (id=1438)

Actual time not defined. Setting to 0.0
The original submitter of attachment 1438 [details] [review] is unknown.
   Reassigning to the person who moved it here: chris@bigballofwax.co.nz.

Comment 1 Magnus Enger 2012-01-17 17:34:41 UTC
There's a patch, but status is NEW. Changing it to Needs Signoff.
Comment 2 Paul Poulain 2012-02-17 14:39:12 UTC
The script devel/misc/testbugzillapatches.pl has detected that this bug does not apply anymore, so i'm marking this bug as "does not apply".

The script is supposed to handle conflicts related to updatedatabase, but no other cases of merge conflict. So the conflict may be trivial to fix.

If it happens that the patch attached does apply cleanly, please send me an email, there's something wrong in the script. It's possible, as it's a recent script.
If the patch applies does not apply as I think, please rebase and resubmit, thanks
Comment 3 MJ Ray (software.coop) 2012-06-10 13:43:01 UTC
I think that this is already in master C4::Search::buildQuery somehow.