Consider following MARC fields in "Fast Add Framework", 020 a- INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER 082 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER a Classification number b Item number 100 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME a Personal name 245 - TITLE STATEMENT a Title b Remainder of title − 250 - EDITION STATEMENT − a Edition statement − 260 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) a Place of publication, distribution, etc b Name of publisher, distributor, etc c Date of publication, distribution, etc 300 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION a Extent 490 - SERIES STATEMENT a Series statement 520 - SUMMARY, ETC. a Summary, etc − 650 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM a Topical term 700 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME a Personal name ... − 942 - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) c Koha [default] item typ Trim subfields in 952 952 -LOCATION AND ITEM INFORMATION 4 Damaged status 9 Koha itemnumber (autogenerated) a Permanent location b Current location c Shelving location d Date acquired g Cost, normal purchase price o Full call number p Barcode
I have many libraries asking for fewer fields. I think that the fast add should just stay as it is and if you want a different one you can edit one and then export it for importing to libraries that want it. For example: http://bywatersolutions.com/2012/09/07/koha-3-8-faster-fast-add-framework/
I agree with Nicole here - I think having even fewer fields in FA and maybe a separate 'simple' framework would be better.