Bug 5421 - More fields to Fast Add Framework
Summary: More fields to Fast Add Framework
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Cataloging (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Galen Charlton
QA Contact: Bugs List
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-11-20 06:13 UTC by vimal kumar
Modified: 2014-12-07 20:02 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description vimal kumar 2010-11-20 06:13:47 UTC
Consider following MARC fields in "Fast Add Framework",

020 a- INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER

082 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER

a Classification number

b Item number

100 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME

a Personal name

245 - TITLE STATEMENT
a Title
b Remainder of title −


250 - EDITION STATEMENT −
a Edition statement −


260 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
a Place of publication, distribution, etc
b Name of publisher, distributor, etc
c Date of publication, distribution, etc

300 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
a Extent

 
490 - SERIES STATEMENT
a Series statement

 
520 - SUMMARY, ETC.
a Summary, etc −

 
650 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
a Topical term

 
700 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
a Personal name ... −

942 - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
c Koha [default] item typ

Trim subfields in 952

952 -LOCATION AND ITEM INFORMATION

4 Damaged status

9 Koha itemnumber (autogenerated)

a Permanent location

b Current location

c Shelving location

d Date acquired

g Cost, normal purchase price

o Full call number

p Barcode
Comment 1 Nicole C. Engard 2013-03-21 15:42:20 UTC
I have many libraries asking for fewer fields.  I think that the fast add should just stay as it is and if you want a different one you can edit one and then export it for importing to libraries that want it.  For example: http://bywatersolutions.com/2012/09/07/koha-3-8-faster-fast-add-framework/
Comment 2 Katrin Fischer 2014-05-17 11:40:25 UTC
I agree with Nicole here - I think having even fewer fields in FA and maybe a separate 'simple' framework would be better.