Analytic links in the OPAC and Staff client should use ti,phr: for title-based searching rather than Title:, in order to reduce the number of false positives.
Hi Jared, I see no problem with that as long as the correct results still show up. :) You know more about the indexes and how they work than I do, so it should have probably been ti,phr from the beginning and perhaps for some of the $w links this should be used too. Katrin
Working on this
Created attachment 5195 [details] [review] Bug 6519 : Changing analytic searches from Title: to ti,phr To test, you should get similar but better results when clicking a volume or set title from a record that is part of a set, (or a single volume)
GBSD#4 take this one
not enough time, I leave
Created attachment 5489 [details] [review] [SIGNED-OFF] Bug 6519 : Changing analytic searches from Title: to ti,phr To test, you should get similar but better results when clicking a volume or set title from a record that is part of a set, (or a single volume) Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> Note: if you are using $w for record linking you have to turn system preference UseControlnumber off to test this patch.
Template only change without any new strings. Marking as Passed QA.
Pushed to master, please test