Bug 7948 - Printing transfer slip loses barcode field focus
Summary: Printing transfer slip loses barcode field focus
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Circulation (show other bugs)
Version: 3.6
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low minor
Assignee: Kyle M Hall
QA Contact: Ian Walls
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-04-12 15:13 UTC by Kyle M Hall
Modified: 2013-12-05 19:59 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Attachments
Bug 7948 - Printing transfer slip loses barcode field focus (3.07 KB, patch)
2012-04-12 15:17 UTC, Kyle M Hall 		Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 7948 - Printing transfer slip loses barcode field focus (3.18 KB, patch)
2012-05-11 14:35 UTC, Liz Rea 		Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kyle M Hall 2012-04-12 15:13:58 UTC 
When printing a transfer slip the cursor does not go back to the text entry box, like it does when printing hold slips.
Comment 1 Kyle M Hall 2012-04-12 15:17:21 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Liz Rea 2012-05-11 14:35:17 UTC 
Created attachment 9516 [details] [review]
Bug 7948 - Printing transfer slip loses barcode field focus

* Refocus on barcode field after running Dopop()
  * Cleaned up javascript, removed tabs

Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
passes t xt
works as advertised.
Comment 3 Paul Poulain 2012-05-22 21:17:05 UTC 
QA comments: in fact, it's a one-liner, with many reintentation fixes.

passed QA
Comment 4 Chris Cormack 2012-05-23 22:01:08 UTC 
Bug fix, will be in 3.8.2

(Paul did you miss changing the status to pushed to master?)
Comment 5 Paul Poulain 2012-05-24 15:50:28 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> (Paul did you miss changing the status to pushed to master?)
Yes I missed, I confirm it is in master