Bug 8005 - Lost item is not anonymized when checked in
Summary: Lost item is not anonymized when checked in
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Circulation (show other bugs)
Version: 3.6
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low normal (vote)
Assignee: Kyle M Hall
QA Contact: Ian Walls
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-04-24 22:00 UTC by Joy Nelson
Modified: 2013-12-05 19:59 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments
Bug 8005 - Lost item is not anonymized when checked in (2.26 KB, patch)
2012-04-25 12:36 UTC, Kyle M Hall
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 8005 - Lost item is not anonymized when checked in (2.36 KB, patch)
2012-06-09 11:14 UTC, Martin Renvoize
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joy Nelson 2012-04-24 22:00:33 UTC
When an item is marked as lost and then later checked in, the circulation history is not anonymized, i.e. the patron who 'lost' it, is still shown as the last person to check out the item.
Comment 1 Kyle M Hall 2012-04-25 12:36:45 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Martin Renvoize 2012-06-09 11:14:57 UTC
Created attachment 10013 [details] [review]
Bug 8005 - Lost item is not anonymized when checked in
Comment 3 Paul Poulain 2012-06-10 10:35:55 UTC
QA comment: small patch, using a sub (GetMemberDetails) that is an heavy one, but using it quite unfrequentely, so it's OK. Other than this, only 3 lines added, passed QA
Comment 4 Paul Poulain 2012-06-10 10:38:15 UTC
Side question: in ReturnLostItem, we use the same sub:
MarkIssueReturned( $borrowernumber, $itemnum );

shouldn't we also add ->privacy parameter ?
Comment 5 Chris Cormack 2012-07-13 01:57:23 UTC
This is in 3.8.x