Bug 8756 - Vendor details and price should carry over to item information.
Summary: Vendor details and price should carry over to item information.
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Acquisitions (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-09-11 05:11 UTC by vimal kumar
Modified: 2015-06-04 23:23 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description vimal kumar 2012-09-11 05:11:36 UTC
When receiving a book in Acquisition module, details like price, vendor name, invoice name etc. should carry over to item information as bibliographic details.
Otherwise librarian has to enter these information manually when cataloging items.
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2012-09-11 05:38:42 UTC
Hi vimal,

I am not sure, but I think at least a part of that functionality is already available.

Have you checked current master for the behaviour there?

I don't think the bibliographic record is the right place to store this information, as you will order the same book from different vendors to different prices over time - but I am also not sure that's what you meant.

We have some better linking between acquisition and item information now, most of it is placed on the 'items' tab when you look at a detail page in the staff interface. So not sure all the information has to be in the item - maybe it's enough if it's pulled together for display.

I am also resetting this to 'master' - because new enhancements should always be filed against master, the version it will be in is set by the RM and RMaints.
Comment 2 Katrin Fischer 2014-08-09 09:09:58 UTC
booksellerid, price, replacementprice are set in items by the acquisition module. Closing this WORKSFORME for now - please open another bug if there is still information missing.