The include file includes/page-numbers.inc tests the previous_page_offset variable. It is equal to 0 if we are on the second page and the previous link does not appears.
Created attachment 13650 [details] [review] Bug 9134: There is no previous link on the second page of the search results page
in the description: s/ and / so /
Created attachment 13696 [details] [review] [Signed off] Bug 9134: There is no previous link on the second page of the search results page Signed-off-by: Melia Meggs <melia@test.bywatersolutions.com>
After applying patch, I can now see the "previous" link on the second page of search results. It works.
Created attachment 13822 [details] [review] [SIGNED-OFF] Bug 9134: There is no previous link on the second page of the search results page Signed-off-by: Melia Meggs <melia@test.bywatersolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> All tests pass. Checked paging forwards, backwards, using 'Previous', 'Next' and page numbers works correctly in staff and OPAC.
This patch has been pushed to master.
Pushed to 3.10.x and 3.8.x, will be in 3.10.1 and 3.8.8
It is a bugfix, not an enhancement. M. Saby
Not sure that matters now, it was released 4 months ago :)