Back to bug 10269

Who When What Removed Added
liz 2013-05-17 09:38:32 UTC CC liz
nengard 2013-05-21 11:14:32 UTC CC nengard
katrin.fischer 2013-07-07 09:48:25 UTC CC katrin.fischer
nengard 2016-12-01 21:58:04 UTC CC nengard
martin.renvoize 2020-03-02 13:17:20 UTC CC martin.renvoize
Depends on 22821
martin.renvoize 2020-03-02 13:50:37 UTC Blocks 22821
Depends on 22821
martin.renvoize 2020-03-02 14:09:21 UTC Status NEW Needs Signoff
martin.renvoize 2020-03-02 14:15:11 UTC Blocks 2234
martin.renvoize 2020-03-02 14:15:17 UTC Blocks 3679
martin.renvoize 2020-03-11 08:23:12 UTC Blocks 4461
jonathan.druart 2020-03-18 09:47:37 UTC Assignee koha-bugs martin.renvoize
CC jonathan.druart
jonathan.druart 2020-03-18 09:47:52 UTC Status Needs Signoff Signed Off
jonathan.druart 2020-03-18 09:48:05 UTC Status Signed Off Passed QA
jonathan.druart 2020-03-18 09:48:08 UTC Attachment #99905 Attachment is obsolete 0 1
Attachment #99906 Attachment is obsolete 0 1
Attachment #99907 Attachment is obsolete 0 1
martin.renvoize 2020-03-18 15:44:51 UTC Status Passed QA Pushed to master
Version(s) released in 20.05.00
hc 2020-03-23 12:19:46 UTC Summary add a way to define a specific replyto email address for some notice Add a way to define a specific replyto email address for some notice
CC hc
joy 2020-04-03 18:34:12 UTC CC joy
martin.renvoize 2020-04-09 05:51:23 UTC Summary Add a way to define a specific replyto email address for some notice Add a way to utilise a specific replyto email address for some notices
martin.renvoize 2020-04-09 05:52:36 UTC Text to go in the release notes This patchset adds the foundations needed to make use of a reply-to address if passed when calling EnqueeLetter.
martin.renvoize 2020-04-09 05:53:40 UTC Text to go in the release notes This patchset adds the foundations needed to make use of a reply-to address if passed when calling EnqueeLetter. This patchset adds the foundations needed to make use of a reply-to address if passed when calling EnqueueLetter.

Further bugs will be used to add interfaces for adding such addresses.

Back to bug 10269