Summary: | Make it possible to configure duplicate check on bibliographic records | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Paul Poulain <paul.poulain> |
Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Galen Charlton <gmcharlt> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | dcook, jean-manuel.broust, marie.hedbom, michaela.sieber, sally.healey, severine.queune, veron |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: |
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14973 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27278 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31472 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37871 |
||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: |
Description
Paul Poulain
2015-11-24 15:46:48 UTC
I like this idea! I was just about to open a ticket because I wanted to add a few indexes (like identifier-standard for 024$a and 022$a and Control-number for 001)to FindDuplicate (which have already been implemented locally). Using record matching rules might really be the best way to do this, since different libraries might have different needs/wants for how to find duplicates. We'd love to add 001 to the checks as this is the most important field for our synchronization with the union catalog. |