Summary: | Staff vs. OPAC advanced search options are different and have different sorting | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nick Clemens (kidclamp) <nick> |
Component: | Searching | Assignee: | Galen Charlton <gmcharlt> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | george, ztajoli |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2467 | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: |
Description
Nick Clemens (kidclamp)
2015-12-14 17:33:38 UTC
I also believe this to be by design: location language = only work when codes are entered, so this is more an expert feature. acquisition-date = also requires a special format YYYY-MM-DD Changing some others and adding them to the OPAC might be debatable, but I see a pointin offering more options to staff users than to OPAC users. |