Bug 15371 - Staff vs. OPAC advanced search options are different and have different sorting
Summary: Staff vs. OPAC advanced search options are different and have different sorting
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Searching (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Galen Charlton
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-12-14 17:33 UTC by Nick Clemens (kidclamp)
Modified: 2020-01-08 22:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nick Clemens (kidclamp) 2015-12-14 17:33:38 UTC 
The dropdowns next to the text box inputs differ on the Staff-client and OPAC

Staff includes/OPAC is missing:
Language
Publication date
Acquisition date
Corporate name as phrase

Series title is nested under Title in Staff, toplevel in OPAC

There are a few more examples, but these illustrate the point.

bug 2467 says this is by design, but I would say they should mirror each other as closely as possible
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2020-01-08 22:21:48 UTC 
I also believe this to be by design:

location 
language
= only work when codes are entered, so this is more an expert feature.

acquisition-date 
= also requires a special format YYYY-MM-DD

Changing some others and adding them to the OPAC might be debatable, but I see a pointin offering more options to staff users than to OPAC users.