Summary: | TT syntax for notices - Prove we have an equivalent for our historical custom syntax | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
Component: | Architecture, internals, and plumbing | Assignee: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | josef.moravec, veron |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 17962, 17963, 17964, 17965, 17966, 17967, 17975, 19578 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 15278, 15280, 15282, 17981 |
Description
Jonathan Druart
2017-01-23 13:07:26 UTC
To achieve this work, I used the notices from the wiki: https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Notices_and_Slips_Library Bug 17962: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ACQ_NOTIF_ON_RECEIV is compatible Bug 17963: TT syntax for notices - Prove that AR_* are compatible Bug 17964: TT syntax for notices - Prove that CHECKIN and CHECKOUT are compatible Bug 17965: TT syntax for notices - Prove that DUEDGST is compatible Bug 17975: TT syntax for notices - Prove that HOLD_SLIP is compatible Bug 17966: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ISSUESLIP is compatible Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible If I read the graph correctly, all depending reports have been resolved. Resolving this now to UNBLOCK some of the related reports. I do not remember if the list was exhaustive. We may need to check the wiki page and make sure the notices under ODUE can be written without regressions using the TT syntax. Added to next meeting's agenda: https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_IRC_meeting_4_April_2018#Agenda |