|
Description
Jonathan Druart
2017-01-23 13:16:33 UTC
Created attachment 59451 [details] [review] Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax Created attachment 61628 [details] [review] Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax Created attachment 63977 [details] [review] Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax Created attachment 65686 [details] [review] Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> Created attachment 66774 [details] [review] Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> Pushed to master for 17.11, thanks to everybody involved! Enhancement not pushed to 17.05.x |