| Summary: | Vertically centre the holding details in each table rows in Cataloguing (staff client) and OPAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Iming Chan <iming> |
| Component: | Architecture, internals, and plumbing | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Crowdfunding committed: | 0 |
| Crowdfunding contact: | Patch complexity: | --- | |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
| Attachments: |
Search results with vertical centering
OPAC Holdings Staff client catalogue record normal view |
||
|
Description
Iming Chan
2019-12-08 11:31:10 UTC
Created attachment 96159 [details]
Search results with vertical centering
I may be misunderstanding this request but if you're talking about the staff client search results, the reason for not vertically centering the title information is that when you have a lot of items it causes the title information to be strangely distant from the previous row in the table.
I agree with Owen that the current behaviour is better. Can you post screenshots for the other points? Created attachment 96177 [details]
OPAC Holdings
See the red line where details are aligned to the top instead of centre.
Created attachment 96178 [details]
Staff client catalogue record normal view
Red lines (not all are marked) showing where field labels and field details are not quite aligned on the same level. As well, the holdings details are aligned more towards the top than centre vertically (like OPAC holding details).
Sorry for the confusion, but I'm actually referring to Holdings found within each catalogue record, not the search result list. See screen shots attached (for staff client and OPAC). Like Owen, I agreed that the current behaviour is the best. Ah, yes, I think it would make sense to have a look at that. (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > Ah, yes, I think it would make sense to have a look at that. = Detail page For the holdings I am not sure. We have libraries with quit a lot of text in the note fields so it would have the same effect we saw on Owen's screenshot for the catalog results. I am happy there with the top alignment right now. The labels in the bibliographic details now align. And I think we can agree to leave the holdings table as is. |