Summary: | Terminology: Replace relatives by other term? (family members, group members...) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer> |
Component: | Templates | Assignee: | Owen Leonard <oleonard> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | aude.charillon, caroline.cyr-la-rose, oleonard |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: |
Description
Katrin Fischer
2020-05-10 11:51:26 UTC
Linked accounts maybe? If we want to change relatives, I would avoid anything family related. Although there is no way that I know of to link accounts without the guarantor/guarantee relationship. I've seen the term "Linked accounts" used elsewhere and it works. I quite like "relatives" because I tend to interpret it in a wider sense - people who have some relation to each other - rather than as "blood relatives". But a native English speaker may have a different point of view! (In reply to Aude Charillon from comment #2) > I've seen the term "Linked accounts" used elsewhere and it works. > > I quite like "relatives" because I tend to interpret it in a wider sense - > people who have some relation to each other - rather than as "blood > relatives". But a native English speaker may have a different point of view! Hi Aude, that's interesting! I didn't look at it like that, as I automatically "translate" it to another term in German. Maybe we should consider using a different German translation :) I'd also be interested to get some native speaker opinions. |