| Summary: | SIP2 no block flag on renewals is passed, but not used | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nick Clemens (kidclamp) <nick> |
| Component: | SIP2 | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | david, martin.renvoize |
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32515 | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Crowdfunding goal: | 0 |
| Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
| Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
| Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | 12225 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
Marking as major - this is a behaviour change from bug 12225 - it seems we have allowed machines to send the no-block in the past and treated it as a normal checkin - now we die on calling a non-existent routine We should add real support for this, but until we do we should stop failing Is this still a major Nick? I've just stumbled into it when working through fee acknowledgement fixes.. but I must admit, I've not come across this one in real life yet. |
C4/SIP/ILS.pm 429 sub renew { 430 my ($self, $patron_id, $patron_pwd, $item_id, $title_id, 431 $no_block, $nb_due_date, $third_party, no_block does not appear elsewhere in the routine