Bug 33286

Summary: 'Catalog record' should be 'Bibliographic record'
Product: Koha Reporter: Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose>
Component: System AdministrationAssignee: Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize>
Status: CLOSED FIXED QA Contact: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy>
Severity: trivial    
Priority: P5 - low CC: fridolin.somers, gmcharlt, m.de.rooy, martin.renvoize, pedro.amorim
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: String patch
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
23.11.00,23.05.03
Circulation function:
Bug Depends on: 31028    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments: Bug 33286: Update 'catalog' to 'bibliographic' in preferences
Bug 33286: Update 'catalog' to 'bibliographic' in preferences
Bug 33286: Update 'catalog' to 'bibliographic' in preferences

Description Caroline Cyr La Rose 2023-03-20 20:17:48 UTC
I noticed in the new 'report a concern' feature, we talk about 'catalog records'. This is not a term used anywhere in Koha. The feature doesn't seem to apply to authority records, so I think we should change it to 'bibliographic records'.

To replicate:
1. Go to Administration > Global system preferences
2. Search for 'concern'
   --> The description for CatalogConcerns is "Allow/Don't allow staff to report concerns about catalog records." (should be "[...] about bibliographic records.")
   --> The description for OpacCatalogConcerns is "Allow/Don't allow OPAC users to report concerns about catalog records." (should be "[...] about bibliographic records."

I didn't check elsewhere yet... Just getting into documenting this.
Comment 1 Martin Renvoize (ashimema) 2023-07-20 13:00:27 UTC
The new feature introduced the 'catalog' term in a few places. The one that I'm not sure about how to replace is 'New catalog concern' which is the button text.  Do you have a suggestion for replacing that.. everything I came up with felt very word heavy and long.

If we can come up with a good resolution for that string I think the other occurences could all follow easily enough.
Comment 2 Caroline Cyr La Rose 2023-07-20 13:18:16 UTC
I don't really mind the "catalog concern" string, because it's a new concept. It was mostly the "catalog record" string that I found was incongruous with the rest of Koha.
Comment 3 Martin Renvoize (ashimema) 2023-07-20 15:58:45 UTC
Created attachment 153735 [details] [review]
Bug 33286: Update 'catalog' to 'bibliographic' in preferences

Correct the terminology to make it clear catalog concerns only concerns
bibliographic records at the moment, not authority records too.
Comment 4 Sam Lau 2023-07-20 16:08:13 UTC
Created attachment 153739 [details] [review]
Bug 33286: Update 'catalog' to 'bibliographic' in preferences

Correct the terminology to make it clear catalog concerns only concerns
bibliographic records at the moment, not authority records too.

Signed-off-by: Sam Lau <samalau@gmail.com>
Comment 5 Marcel de Rooy 2023-07-21 09:51:02 UTC
So I cant report concerns anymore about catalogers?
Comment 6 Marcel de Rooy 2023-07-21 09:51:30 UTC
Created attachment 153767 [details] [review]
Bug 33286: Update 'catalog' to 'bibliographic' in preferences

Correct the terminology to make it clear catalog concerns only concerns
bibliographic records at the moment, not authority records too.

Signed-off-by: Sam Lau <samalau@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Comment 7 Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) 2023-07-21 20:15:20 UTC
Pushed to master for 23.11.

Nice work everyone, thanks!
Comment 8 Fridolin Somers 2023-08-04 02:03:50 UTC
Pushed to 23.05.x for 23.05.03
Comment 9 Pedro Amorim 2023-08-18 11:40:34 UTC
Feature not in 22.11.x. Not pushing.