Summary: | Ability to make draft Additional Contents (pages, news, html customizations, etc) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Aleisha Amohia <aleisha> |
Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | andrew |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 15326 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Aleisha Amohia
2023-09-28 22:11:39 UTC
Agreed that it'd be more clear to have an explicit "Draft" checkbox rather than just relying on date. This change should be applied to all additional contents types. Elsewhere in Koha we more commonly assume that an undefined date/limit should be open-ended. Following that logic, we'd expect additional contents to be displayed when the start date is null/blank. If we add a Draft flag, I'd like to also start treating an undefined start date as indication that this item should display immediately. (In reply to Andrew Fuerste-Henry from comment #1) > > Elsewhere in Koha we more commonly assume that an undefined date/limit > should be open-ended. Following that logic, we'd expect additional contents > to be displayed when the start date is null/blank. If we add a Draft flag, > I'd like to also start treating an undefined start date as indication that > this item should display immediately. I agree with this. It is unexpected that not specifying a date means your content doesn't show up. |