| Summary: | Visualize MARC fields 310 and 362 for serial publications | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | verolencinas <verolencinas> |
| Component: | MARC Bibliographic data support | Assignee: | Owen Leonard <oleonard> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | dcook, m.de.rooy, sfelh04 |
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
verolencinas
2024-02-06 13:14:51 UTC
This is also a feature my Library would like Adding these fields to the default xslt files would be helpful How would you want this information to display? For a 362 field, the label should read "Publication volumes:" or "Publication dates:" and then the content of the 362 $a field. I don't see a need to differentiate labels or other info based on the 0 or 1 indicator. For the 310 and 321 fields, both the $a and $b subfields should display if in the records. The labels for these would read "Current frequency" and "Former frequency" respectively. For the Details screen, my preference would be to have the 362 display in the results screen after the 300 and then followed by the 310 and 321. 300 362 310 321 I think the 362 alone in a Results screen would be fine. Hi! I am interested in this report especially for the 362 field. Note that we like to see it on OPAC as well as staff normal/detail view. I changed the version to Main, since it still needs to be done. I changed the category to MARC data, since it also affects staff. Are you planning to submit code here, Owen? |