Bug 37788

Summary: in UNIMARC 099$t and 995$h sould not both be indexed in ccode
Product: Koha Reporter: Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro>
Component: SearchingAssignee: Bugs List <koha-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: normal    
Priority: P5 - low CC: phil
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
GIT URL: Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: --- Documentation contact:
Documentation submission: Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Description Mathieu Saby 2024-08-30 07:45:49 UTC
099$t and 995$h are both indexed in ccode. I believe this is not good, as those two fields can contain different values. Is it possible to create a distinct index for 099$t ?
Comment 1 Mathieu Saby 2024-08-30 07:47:58 UTC
In standard configuration, 099$t is linked to "TYPEDOC" authorized values. So why not creating a typedoc index?
Comment 2 Phil Ringnalda 2024-11-08 21:14:26 UTC
099$t isn't trying to be a ccode, it's trying to be a biblio-level itemtype without being an itemtype, as you discovered in bug 38336

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38336 ***