Bug 37788 - in UNIMARC 099$t and 995$h sould not both be indexed in ccode
Summary: in UNIMARC 099$t and 995$h sould not both be indexed in ccode
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Searching (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low normal
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-08-30 07:45 UTC by Mathieu Saby
Modified: 2024-08-30 07:47 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mathieu Saby 2024-08-30 07:45:49 UTC
099$t and 995$h are both indexed in ccode. I believe this is not good, as those two fields can contain different values. Is it possible to create a distinct index for 099$t ?
Comment 1 Mathieu Saby 2024-08-30 07:47:58 UTC
In standard configuration, 099$t is linked to "TYPEDOC" authorized values. So why not creating a typedoc index?