Bug 37924

Summary:	Some UNIMARC subfields of 995 field are indexed in wrong indexes
Product:	Koha	Reporter:	Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro>
Component:	Searching	Assignee:	Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Testopia <testopia>
Severity:	minor
Priority:	P5 - low
Version:	Main
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Change sponsored?:	---	Patch complexity:	---
Documentation contact:		Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:		Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Bug Depends on:	30373
Bug Blocks:

Description Mathieu Saby 2024-09-13 16:50:23 UTC

After https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30373 the meaning of some subfields of 995 field (used for items) have changed. The configuration of Zebra and Elasticsearch must take those changes into account.

6 changes must be made : 

- 995$3 is indexed with zebra in "withdrawn" index. It should be "restricted" index
- it is not indexed in Elasticsearch. It should be indexed in Elasticsearch "restricted" index 
- 995$8 is indexed in Elasticsearch in "ccode" index. It should be "coded-location-qualifier" index
- it is not indexed in Zebra. It should also be indexed in Zebra "coded-location-qualifier" index
- 995$a is indexed in "homebranch" index. It should be "acqsource" index
- it is not indexed in Elasticsearch. it should also be indexed in Elasticsearch "acqsource" index

Comment 1 Mathieu Saby 2024-09-30 16:46:19 UTC

I am writing a patch