Bug 37924 - Some UNIMARC subfields of 995 field are indexed in wrong indexes
Summary: Some UNIMARC subfields of 995 field are indexed in wrong indexes
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Searching (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low minor
Assignee: Mathieu Saby
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 30373
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2024-09-13 16:50 UTC by Mathieu Saby
Modified: 2024-09-30 16:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mathieu Saby 2024-09-13 16:50:23 UTC 
After https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30373 the meaning of some subfields of 995 field (used for items) have changed. The configuration of Zebra and Elasticsearch must take those changes into account.

6 changes must be made : 

- 995$3 is indexed with zebra in "withdrawn" index. It should be "restricted" index
- it is not indexed in Elasticsearch. It should be indexed in Elasticsearch "restricted" index 
- 995$8 is indexed in Elasticsearch in "ccode" index. It should be "coded-location-qualifier" index
- it is not indexed in Zebra. It should also be indexed in Zebra "coded-location-qualifier" index
- 995$a is indexed in "homebranch" index. It should be "acqsource" index
- it is not indexed in Elasticsearch. it should also be indexed in Elasticsearch "acqsource" index
Comment 1 Mathieu Saby 2024-09-30 16:46:19 UTC 
I am writing a patch