Summary: | Add other standard identifier (024$a) to OPAC/Staff interface detail pages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Lucas Gass (lukeg) <lucas> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Lucas Gass (lukeg) <lucas> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | alexander.wagner, m.de.rooy, roman.dolny |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38425 | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | Small patch | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: | ||
Attachments: | Bug 39852: Add 024$a to MARC21 detail pages |
Description
Lucas Gass (lukeg)
2025-05-07 14:46:52 UTC
Created attachment 182033 [details] [review] Bug 39852: Add 024$a to MARC21 detail pages To test: 1. APPLY PATCH and restart_all 2. Find or create a record with a single 024$a. 3. The filed shoud display as 'Other standard identifier' in the staff detail page. 4. Try the OPAC detail page, the display should be the same. 5. Add multiple 024$a to a single record. 6. The display should look right on both the OPAC and staff interface, with each 024$a being pip seperated. +1 But shouldn't we use the value from the first indicator (Type of standard number or code) to create appropriate labels for the values of subfield $a? Values from 0 to 4 are specified, 7 is based on subfield $2, 8 is unspecified. Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to build useful links to external sources? (In reply to Alexander Wagner from comment #3) > Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to > build useful links to external sources? Yup, I wasn't aware of that one but we should! |