Bug 39852

Summary: Add other standard identifier (024$a) to OPAC/Staff interface detail pages
Product: Koha Reporter: Lucas Gass (lukeg) <lucas>
Component: CatalogingAssignee: Lucas Gass (lukeg) <lucas>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P5 - low CC: alexander.wagner, m.de.rooy, roman.dolny
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
See Also: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38425
GIT URL: Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: Small patch Documentation contact:
Documentation submission: Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Attachments: Bug 39852: Add 024$a to MARC21 detail pages

Description Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-07 14:46:52 UTC
We should add the 024$a to the record display for OPAC/Staff interface detail pages.
Comment 1 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-07 15:39:17 UTC
Created attachment 182033 [details] [review]
Bug 39852: Add 024$a to MARC21 detail pages

To test:
1. APPLY PATCH and restart_all
2. Find or create a record with a single 024$a.
3. The filed shoud display as 'Other standard identifier' in the staff detail page.
4. Try the OPAC detail page, the display should be the same.
5. Add multiple 024$a to a single record.
6. The display should look right on both the OPAC and staff interface, with each 024$a being pip seperated.
Comment 2 Roman Dolny 2025-05-07 18:43:25 UTC
+1

But shouldn't we use the value from the first indicator (Type of standard number or code) to create appropriate labels for the values of subfield $a?

Values from 0 to 4 are specified, 7 is based on subfield $2, 8 is unspecified.
Comment 3 Alexander Wagner 2025-05-08 10:05:11 UTC
Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to build useful links to external sources?
Comment 4 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-08 14:44:01 UTC
(In reply to Alexander Wagner from comment #3)
> Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to
> build useful links to external sources?

Yup, I wasn't aware of that one but we should!
Comment 5 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-08 14:44:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38425 ***