We should add the 024$a to the record display for OPAC/Staff interface detail pages.
Created attachment 182033 [details] [review] Bug 39852: Add 024$a to MARC21 detail pages To test: 1. APPLY PATCH and restart_all 2. Find or create a record with a single 024$a. 3. The filed shoud display as 'Other standard identifier' in the staff detail page. 4. Try the OPAC detail page, the display should be the same. 5. Add multiple 024$a to a single record. 6. The display should look right on both the OPAC and staff interface, with each 024$a being pip seperated.
+1 But shouldn't we use the value from the first indicator (Type of standard number or code) to create appropriate labels for the values of subfield $a? Values from 0 to 4 are specified, 7 is based on subfield $2, 8 is unspecified.
Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to build useful links to external sources?
(In reply to Alexander Wagner from comment #3) > Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to > build useful links to external sources? Yup, I wasn't aware of that one but we should!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38425 ***
I am reviving this because I no longer consider it a duplicate of Bug 38425.
What if the 024$a is a URI ? (Should we add a link..) In the back of my mind - out of scope here probably - also having the 024$1 from the linked authorities to this biblio btw. (Say you linked Vermeer here and its authority links to Wikidata or another external source.)