Bug 39852 - Add other standard identifier (024$a) to OPAC/Staff interface detail pages
Summary: Add other standard identifier (024$a) to OPAC/Staff interface detail pages
Status: REOPENED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Cataloging (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Lucas Gass (lukeg)
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2025-05-07 14:46 UTC by Lucas Gass (lukeg)
Modified: 2026-02-16 10:10 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
GIT URL:
Initiative type: ---
Sponsorship status: ---
Comma delimited list of Sponsors:
Crowdfunding goal: 0
Patch complexity: Small patch
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments
Bug 39852: Add 024$a to MARC21 detail pages (3.09 KB, patch)
2025-05-07 15:39 UTC, Lucas Gass (lukeg)
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-07 14:46:52 UTC
We should add the 024$a to the record display for OPAC/Staff interface detail pages.
Comment 1 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-07 15:39:17 UTC
Created attachment 182033 [details] [review]
Bug 39852: Add 024$a to MARC21 detail pages

To test:
1. APPLY PATCH and restart_all
2. Find or create a record with a single 024$a.
3. The filed shoud display as 'Other standard identifier' in the staff detail page.
4. Try the OPAC detail page, the display should be the same.
5. Add multiple 024$a to a single record.
6. The display should look right on both the OPAC and staff interface, with each 024$a being pip seperated.
Comment 2 Roman Dolny 2025-05-07 18:43:25 UTC
+1

But shouldn't we use the value from the first indicator (Type of standard number or code) to create appropriate labels for the values of subfield $a?

Values from 0 to 4 are specified, 7 is based on subfield $2, 8 is unspecified.
Comment 3 Alexander Wagner 2025-05-08 10:05:11 UTC
Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to build useful links to external sources?
Comment 4 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-08 14:44:01 UTC
(In reply to Alexander Wagner from comment #3)
> Shouldn't we integrate this with Bug 38425, which uses the values from $2 to
> build useful links to external sources?

Yup, I wasn't aware of that one but we should!
Comment 5 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2025-05-08 14:44:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38425 ***
Comment 6 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2026-02-13 16:29:02 UTC
I am reviving this because I no longer consider it a duplicate of Bug 38425.
Comment 7 Marcel de Rooy 2026-02-16 10:10:11 UTC
What if the 024$a is a URI ? (Should we add a link..)

In the back of my mind - out of scope here probably - also having the 024$1 from the linked authorities to this biblio btw. (Say you linked Vermeer here and its authority links to Wikidata or another external source.)