Summary: | defaultSortField & OPACdefaultSortField non functioning | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nicole C. Engard <nengard> |
Component: | System Administration | Assignee: | Sophie MEYNIEUX <sophie.meynieux> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | fridolin.somers, koha.sekjal, stephane.delaune |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | Sponsored | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Attachments: | proposed patch |
Description
Chris Cormack
2010-05-21 01:24:34 UTC
Nicole, just checked what ian said, it's still relevant I think. Created attachment 4809 [details] [review] proposed patch This patch just fixes what Ian said. On an existing install it won't do anything. I do not believe that the current form of this bug is a data issue; I'm seeing a newly upgraded library lose the default sort choice in both OPAC and staff client since they upgraded to 3.4, which makes me suspect a T:T error. Explicitly resetting the sort values did nothing to fix the problem. Ian, I agree with you, there are probably 2 problems : * the default value set to NULL. My patch address just this * the sort order is not respected. I've checked on biblibre/master, and confirm we also have the problem, so it's not a new one. (In reply to comment #5) > Ian, I agree with you, there are probably 2 problems : > * the default value set to NULL. My patch address just this > * the sort order is not respected. I've checked on biblibre/master, and confirm > we also have the problem, so it's not a new one. Hie, In patch, default value is "desc", but the choices are "dsc|asc". Default value should be "dsc", without "e". Regards, I'm taking Fridolyn's comment as a serious issue with the patch, and marking as Failed QA. If this is not actually a problem, please provide documentation that it can still work with the 'e' in 'desc' Without applying any patch, I have tried to change the value of thoses sysprefs several times and search results seems to be correctly sorted. Nicole, could you give more information if it still does not work for you ? (In reply to comment #8) > Without applying any patch, I have tried to change the value of thoses > sysprefs several times and search results seems to be correctly sorted. > Nicole, could you give more information if it still does not work for you ? The problem only occurs on a fresh install. The first modification of the syspref will set a value. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 8012 *** |