Summary: | bibitems.publicationyear is not mapped to 260$c for MARC21 frameworks | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Mason James <mtj> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Galen Charlton <gmcharlt> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | katrin.fischer |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: |
Description
Mason James
2012-03-25 14:54:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > as per this spec... > > http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd260.html oops, 260$c *is* linked :) its linked to biblio.copyrightdate for MARC21 but, biblioitems.publicationyear for UNIMARC hmm, should they both point to the same DB field? does this need to be corrected still? i think they should both be the same. which one - i an not sure i'll leave this open for now... Hi Mason, I am not sure, but maybe this is a WONTFIX. At least I am not sure how we can resolve this inconsistency correctly for new and existing installations. (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2) > Hi Mason, > I am not sure, but maybe this is a WONTFIX. At least I am not sure how we > can resolve this inconsistency correctly for new and existing installations. Hmm, yes i agree even if we were to fix this issue, i'm not sure which mapping of the two is the 'correct' one marking as WONTFIX |