Summary: | Disabled buttons not distinguishable from enabled buttons. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Kyle M Hall <kyle.m.hall> |
Component: | Templates | Assignee: | Owen Leonard <oleonard> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | chris, jonathan.druart, paul.poulain |
Version: | 3.10 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Attachments: |
Bug 8107 - Disabled buttons not distinguishable from enabled buttons
Bug 8107 - Disabled buttons not distinguishable from enabled buttons |
Description
Kyle M Hall
2012-05-16 12:10:13 UTC
Created attachment 9645 [details] [review] Bug 8107 - Disabled buttons not distinguishable from enabled buttons Add a "greyed-out" style for disabled buttons. Having looked through the templates for examples of usage of this I'm not convinced that we should really be showing disabled buttons. I think in general it would be better to hide or show a button based on whether the action is available. Created attachment 9662 [details] [review] Bug 8107 - Disabled buttons not distinguishable from enabled buttons Add a "greyed-out" style for disabled buttons. Having looked through the templates for examples of usage of this I'm not convinced that we should really be showing disabled buttons. I think in general it would be better to hide or show a button based on whether the action is available. Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> I agree, I think hiding or showing is better, but this patch is harmless enough, until we want to go fixing our usage QA Comments: Simple ergonomic modification Passed QA. probably usefull and harmless to backport to 3.8 Pushed to 3.8.x, will be in 3.8.2 |