Summary: | Add <item>...</item> syntax to advance_notices.pl | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Barton Chittenden <barton> |
Component: | Notices | Assignee: | Barton Chittenden <barton> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | black23, clackman, dcook, r.delahunty |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29100 | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 30259 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Barton Chittenden
2016-09-12 13:02:59 UTC
+1 - more consistency and better formatting options. Still much wanted :) Since we're moving to TT syntax for notices, perhaps we should invalidate this one? (In reply to David Cook from comment #3) > Since we're moving to TT syntax for notices, perhaps we should invalidate > this one? I've linked to bug 29100 with that idea in mind, but wanted to have nice documentation in place first :) (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #4) > (In reply to David Cook from comment #3) > > Since we're moving to TT syntax for notices, perhaps we should invalidate > > this one? > > I've linked to bug 29100 with that idea in mind, but wanted to have nice > documentation in place first :) We could do better with documentation still, but I think bug 29100 obsoletes this one. |