| Summary: | Holds - Branch Transfer Limits | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Kyle M Hall (khall) <kyle> |
| Component: | Architecture, internals, and plumbing | Assignee: | Jesse Maseto <jesse> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | ||
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Kyle M Hall (khall)
2018-02-21 08:00:12 UTC
I think this is a possible duplicate to some other existing bug reports concerning the branch transfer limits: Bug 7614 - Branch transfer limit and holds Bug 11020 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a hold/reservation in Staff client Bug 10993 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a hold/reservation in OPAC Kyle, can you please check and mark duplicate if it fits? The other bugs have patches, but not sure if something can be salvaged from there. Discussion might still be interesting. (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > I think this is a possible duplicate to some other existing bug reports > concerning the branch transfer limits: > > Bug 7614 - Branch transfer limit and holds > Bug 11020 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a > hold/reservation in Staff client > Bug 10993 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a > hold/reservation in OPAC > > Kyle, can you please check and mark duplicate if it fits? The other bugs > have patches, but not sure if something can be salvaged from there. > Discussion might still be interesting. Thanks for letting me know! It definitely appears worth picking back up on some of those! |