Bug 20257 - Holds - Branch Transfer Limits
Summary: Holds - Branch Transfer Limits
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 7614
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Jesse Maseto
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-02-21 08:00 UTC by Kyle M Hall (khall)
Modified: 2018-09-19 14:13 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kyle M Hall (khall) 2018-02-21 08:00:12 UTC 
Modify C4::Reserve::AddReserve to check if placing the hold would violate Branch
Transfer Limits, if UseBranchTransferLimits is enabled. If so, deny the hold.
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2018-02-23 08:50:15 UTC 
I think this is a possible duplicate to some other existing bug reports concerning the branch transfer limits:

Bug 7614 - Branch transfer limit and holds 
Bug 11020 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a hold/reservation in Staff client
Bug 10993 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a hold/reservation in OPAC

Kyle, can you please check and mark duplicate if it fits? The other bugs have patches, but not sure if something can be salvaged from there. Discussion might still be interesting.
Comment 2 Kyle M Hall (khall) 2018-06-22 14:08:40 UTC 
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1)
> I think this is a possible duplicate to some other existing bug reports
> concerning the branch transfer limits:
> 
> Bug 7614 - Branch transfer limit and holds 
> Bug 11020 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a
> hold/reservation in Staff client
> Bug 10993 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a
> hold/reservation in OPAC
> 
> Kyle, can you please check and mark duplicate if it fits? The other bugs
> have patches, but not sure if something can be salvaged from there.
> Discussion might still be interesting.

Thanks for letting me know! It definitely appears worth picking back up on some of those!
Comment 3 Kyle M Hall (khall) 2018-09-19 14:13:32 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7614 ***